Cardinal Sarah Urges Obedience And Unity Amid SSPX Plan To Ordain Bishops Without Papal Approval...



UNITED

"We do not want division within the Church, That will solve nothing. You cannot separate yourself from the Holy Father in Rome!"

- The Bayside Prophecies

Our Lady of the Roses, September 27, 1986


REMAIN

"Do not judge My Son's Church by man. The foundation is My Son, Jesus. And though the walls may develop cracks, the foundation is solid. Will you not remain and patch these cracks, My children? We do not wish that you break apart into small groups of discord. No schisms must take place in My Son's Church. For all who are baptized a Roman Catholic must die Roman Catholics to enter Heaven."

- The Bayside Prophecies

Our Lady of the Roses, November 20,1979


The above Messages from Our Lady were given to Veronica Lueken at Bayside, New York.




Cardinal Sarah Urges Obedience And Unity Amid SSPX Plan To Ordain Bishops Without Papal Approval...


CatholicVote.org reported on February 23, 2026:


By McKenna Snow


Cardinal Robert Sarah, prefect emeritus of the dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, spoke out Feb. 22 urging the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) — which recently said it intends to ordain new bishops without papal permission — to remain in unity and canonical obedience to the pope, the successor of Saint Peter, emphasizing that this obedience “guarantees our bond with Christ Himself.”


Rome-based Catholic journalist Diane Montagna posted to her Substack Feb. 23 the full English translation of Cardinal Sarah’s statement made in the French publication Le Journal du Dimanche the day before.


In the statement, Cardinal Sarah, archbishop emeritus of Conakry, Guinea, and a longstanding supporter of the Traditional Latin Mass and reverent practices in the liturgy, urged the SSPX to remain in communion with the Church.


Zeale News reported Feb. 19 that the SSPX decided to proceed with the July 1 episcopal ordinations without Pope Leo’s permission. The decision followed a Feb. 12 meeting between SSPX Superior General Father Davide Pagliarani and Cardinal Victor Fernández, Vatican prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, in Rome, where the two parties discussed a possible way forward. Cardinal Fernández proposed future dialogue to address the SSPX’s theological concerns, and after the meeting, the SSPX council considered whether to accept the prefect’s offer of dialogue.


The suggested path required that the SSPX suspend the plan to ordain new bishops. The SSPX decided to reject the offer, despite the prefect’s statement that proceeding with the ordinations without papal approval “would imply a decisive rupture of ecclesial communion (schism), with grave consequences for the Society as a whole.” Fr. Pagliarani told Cardinal Fernández in the Feb. 19 statement that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally,” especially related to “fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” He later added that he does not see how the proposed dialogue could lead to reaching “the minimum requirements for full communion with the Catholic Church.” The SSPX also said it does not believe the ordinations would constitute a schism.


In urging the SSPX to remain in unity with the Holy See, Cardinal Sarah emphasized in his Feb. 22 statement that Christ “is our sole salvation.”


“His Name is the only one by which we can be saved,” the cardinal wrote. “But where can we find Jesus Christ, the one Redeemer? Saint Augustine answers us with clarity: ‘Where the Church is, there is Christ.’ We know that there is no salvation outside the Church. That is why our concern for the salvation of souls is expressed in our constant solicitude to lead them to the one source: Christ, who gives Himself in and through the Church.”


He said that the Church of Rome is “a necessary point of reference” governed by the successor of Saint Peter, who Jesus entrusted to shepherd the faithful.


“The Church is one. She is the Church that Christ entrusted to Peter and to the Twelve. Indeed, the Church is, fundamentally, according to the expression of Mark and Luke, ‘Peter and those who are with him,’” he said, referencing the Gospels of Mark (1:36) and Luke (9:32). “Primacy is therefore given to Peter, and thus one can see one single Church and one single Chair… Can one who abandons the Chair of Peter still claim to be within the Church of Christ?”


Cardinal Sarah said that because of this, “I wish to express my grave concern and my profound sorrow upon learning of the announcement by the [SSPX]” to move forward with the episcopal ordinations.


The cardinal criticized the argument that the ordinations are justified because their intention is for the good of souls.


“We are told that this decision to disobey the law of the Church is motivated by the supreme law of the salvation of souls: suprema lex, salus animarum,” he wrote. “But salvation is Christ, and He gives Himself only within the Church. How can one claim to lead souls to salvation by paths other than those He Himself has indicated to us? Is it truly to will the salvation of souls to rend the Mystical Body of Christ in a perhaps irreversible way? How many souls risk being lost because of this new tear in the seamless garment of the Church?”


Another argument is that the ordinations are intended to help defend “Tradition and the integrity of the Deposit of Faith.” Cardinal Sarah acknowledged that he personally knows “only too well how the Deposit of Faith is sometimes scorned even by those who have the mission to defend it.”


He continued that the faithful should be more fully aware “that there exists an unbroken continuity in the life of the Church — in the proclamation of God, in the celebration of the sacraments — which reaches down to us and which we call Tradition,” and said this guarantees “that what we believe is the original message of Christ preached by the Apostles,” which is at its heart the news of the Passion, Death, and Resurrection of Jesus.


Obedience, even when it is painful, is also essential to the Catholic faith, Cardinal Sarah continued.


He said he both knows and firmly believes “that at the heart of the Catholic faith lies our mission to follow Christ, who became obedient unto death — even death on a Cross. Can one truly dispense with following Christ in His humility, even unto the Cross? Is it not a betrayal of Tradition to take refuge in merely human means in order to preserve our works, even if they be good?”


He acknowledged that supernatural faith in the Church’s indefectibility — meaning that the Church is immutable until the end of time — can cause the faithful to lament along with Jesus “when we see the betrayals and cowardice of an ever-increasing number of high-ranking prelates” who teach their own opinions and personal visions, rather than the Deposit of Faith, on issues of doctrine and morals but said that “it can never lead us to renounce obedience to the Church.”


Continuing, Cardinal Sarah wrote: “The good of souls can never be served by deliberate disobedience, for the good of souls is a supernatural reality. Let us not reduce salvation to a worldly game of media pressure.”


Numerous times in the statement, he quoted Saint Catherine of Siena — whom he noted rebuked cardinals and the pope — who nevertheless emphasized the importance of obedience to the pope, the “representative of Christ on earth” and “shepherd of the Church” tasked with leading souls to Christ.


He also recalled the unjust condemnation faced by Saint Padre Pio, who was prohibited from hearing confessions for 12 years, despite having received a special grace from God to help sinners’ souls. He noted that Padre Pio did not “rebel in the name of fidelity to God” or “disobey in the name of the salvation of souls,” but rather stayed silent.


“He embraced crucifying obedience, certain that his humility would be more fruitful than rebellion,” Cardinal Sarah continued. “[Padre Pio] wrote: ‘The good God has made me understand that obedience is the only thing that pleases Him, and for me the only means to hope for salvation and to sing of victory.’”


Cardinal Sarah also distinguished between devotion to the man who is pope and canonical obedience to the Successor of Peter.


“It is not a matter of worldly or ideological fidelity to a man and to his personal ideas. It is not a matter of being partisans of a man. It is not a matter of papolatry or of a cult of personality surrounding the Pope. It is not a matter of obeying the Pope insofar as he expresses his personal ideas, opinions, or ideological positions on grave doctrinal and moral questions,” he wrote. “It is a matter of obeying the Pope who says, like Jesus: ‘My doctrine is not Mine, but His who sent Me’ (Jn 7:16).


“It is a matter of a supernatural understanding of canonical obedience, which guarantees our bond with Christ Himself. This is the sole guarantee that our struggle for the faith, Catholic morality, and the liturgical tradition does not stray into ideology. Christ has given us no other certain sign. To leave the Barque of Peter and to organize oneself autonomously, in a closed circle like a sect, is to deliver oneself to the waves of the storm.”


Cardinal Sarah acknowledged that, as Christ warned in Scripture, that “there are wolves disguised as lambs” even within the Church, but again emphasized that the best guarantee against heresy and fallibility is in canonical and supernatural attachment to Saint Peter’s Successor.


Concluding, the cardinal drew attention to Christ’s prayer in the Agony in the Garden and warned against acts of disunity that cause further pain.


“How can one remain insensitive to the anguished prayer of Jesus: ‘Father, that they may be one, even as We are one’ (Jn 17:22)?” he wrote. “How can one fail to be moved by this cry of Jesus, who desires our unity, and yet continue to tear apart His Body under the pretext of saving souls? Is it not He — Jesus — who saves? Is it we and our structures who save souls? Is it not through our unity that the world will believe and be saved? This unity is first that of the Catholic faith; it is also that of charity; and finally, it is that of obedience.”




"The judgment of your God is not akin to the judgment of man. The Eternal Father will only judge by the heart. Your rank, your accumulation of worldly goods does not set you up before another. Many have sold their souls within the holy House of God. Better that you strip yourself and remove all worldly interests now while you have the time to make amends to your God, for many mitres will fall into hell."

- The Bayside Prophecies

St. Thomas Aquinas, August 21, 1972




SOURCE:

The electronic form of this document is copyrighted.

Quotations are permissible as long as this web site is acknowledged with a hyperlink to: http://www.tldm.org

Copyright © These Last Days Ministries, Inc. 1996 - 2025 All rights reserved.




Reflections on “Women’s Liberation”...



 "The mystery in woman is her greatest asset. Satan seeks to take away woman's identity. The holy Bible has in prophecy: the time will come in the end that woman will seek to be as man. They will wear his clothes and want to eat his bread. [see Isaias 4:1]"

- The Bayside Prophecies

Our Lady of the Roses, May 10, 1972







Reflections on “Women’s Liberation”...


The following quotes are various reflections on the women’s liberation movement:


"Remember this: The strongest sign of the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization of women. It is notable that in Communist nations women are exhorted, and compelled, to do what has traditionally been men's work. American women, some of them, feel triumphant that they have broken down the ‘barricades’ between the work of the sexes. I hope they will still feel triumphant when some commissar forces a shovel or an axe into their soft hands and compels them to pound and cut forests and dig ditches. I hope they will be ‘happy’ when a husband deserts them and they must support their children and themselves alone. (After all, if a woman must be ‘free’ she shouldn’t object to men being free too, should she?) I hope they will feel 'fulfilled' when they are given no more courtesies due to their sex and no kindnesses, but are kicked aside on the subways buses by men, and jostled out of the way by men on busy sidewalks and elevators…. I hope, when they look in their mirrors, that they will be pleased to see exhausted, embittered faces, and that they will be consoled by their paychecks." - Taylor Caldwell in "They’re Spoiling Eve's Great Con Game," American Opinion, September 1970, page 8.


"The idea of woman’s emancipation is based upon a profound enmity between the sexes, upon envy and imitation. Woman becomes a mere caricature, a pseudo-being." - Russian philosopher Berdyaev, quoted in Elliot's Let Me Be a Woman, page 158.


"It is not surprising that feminists, who misconstrue so much, misconstrue the nature of the opposition to them. Since their position requires a comprehensive and minute system of ideological regimentation they assume antifeminists must also be aspiring tyrants. They thus recreate their opponents in their own image. In fact, to be antifeminist is simply to accept that men and women differ and rely on each other to be different, and to view the differences as among the things constituting human life that should be reflected where appropriate in social attitudes and institutions. By feminist standards all societies have been thoroughly sexist. It follows that to be antifeminist is only to abandon the bigotry of a present-day ideology that sees traditional relations between the sexes as simply a matter of domination and submission, and to accept the validity of the ways in which human beings have actually dealt with sex, children, family life and so on. Antifeminism is thus nothing more than the rejection of one of the narrow and destructive fantasies of an age in which such things have been responsible for destruction and murder on an unprecedented scale. It is opening oneself to the reality of things." - Jim Kalb


"A woman will not understand what true dependency is until she is cradling her own infant in her arms; nor will she likely achieve the self-confidence she craves until she has withstood, and transcended, the weight of responsibility a family places upon her -- a weight that makes all the paperwork and assignments of her in-basket seem feather-light." - Danielle Crittenden, What Our Mothers Didn’t Tell Us, page 74.


The world has enough women who are tough; we need women who are tender. There are enough women who are coarse; we need women who are kind. There are enough women who are rude; we need women who are refined. We have enough women of fame and fortune; we need more women of faith. We have enough greed; we need more goodness. We have enough vanity; we need more virtue. We have enough popularity; we need more purity." - Margaret D. Nadauld in " What Our Mothers Didn’t Tell UsEnsign, Nov. 2000, 15.



"I love peace and quiet, I hate politics and turmoil. We women are not made for governing, and if we are good women, we must dislike these masculine occupations." - Queen Victoria


"[F]eminists who ceaselessly inveigh against their own oppression by men (often hardly specifying its exact nature) would ignore how they themselves have oppressed … feminine women. It oppresses a woman who could delight in domesticity to tell her that her domesticity makes her a parasitic inferior to men. It oppresses a woman who yearns to stay home with her children to tell her she is worthy only insofar as she achieves in the workplace." - F. Carolyn Graglia, A Brief Against Feminism, page 349.


"[W]hat a traditional woman did that made her home warm and alive was not dusting and laundry.... Her real secret was that she identified herself with her home, [and]...it is illuminating to think about what happened when things went right. Then her affection was in the soft sofa cushions, clean linens, and good meals; her memory in well-stocked storeroom cabinets and the pantry; her intelligence in the order and healthfulness of her home; her good humor in its light and air. She lived her life not only through her own body, but through the house as an extension of her body; part of her relation to those she loved was embodied in the physical medium of the home she made. My own experience convinces me that there is still no other way to make a good home than to have attitudes toward home and domesticity modeled on those of that traditional woman.... Advertisements and television programs offer degraded images of household work and workers. Discussions of the subject in magazines and newspapers follow a standard formula.... It is scarcely surprising, then, that so many people imagine housekeeping to be boring, frustrating, repetitive, unintelligent drudgery. I cannot agree. (In fact, having kept house, practiced law, taught, and done many other sorts of work, low- and high-paid, I can assure you that it is actually lawyers who are most familiar with the experience of unintelligent drudgery.)" - Cheryl Mendelson, Home Comforts: The Art and Science of Keeping House, pages 9-10.


"The feminist movement as we have come to know it in recent decades is fundamentally a "con." It is as filled with falsehood, inaccuracy, and foolishness as astrology or parapsychology. As it is considered treasonous to criticise a sister feminist, no standards of accuracy or honesty are ever enforced. Hyperbole and deceit thus become the formula for success, "peer review" playing no role in reining in misinformation. Any would-be feminist who raises scholarly objections to the rampant misinformation (Christina Hoff Sommers , Camille Paglia , Elaine Showalter , Erin Pizzey , Elizabeth Loftus, etc.) is branded an 'enemy of women' and is drummed out of the movement." - Robert Sheaffer of Patriarchy.com.



"A recent incident on a railroad train justly illustrates the result [of women’s 'rights']. A solitary female entered a car where every seat was occupied, and the conductor closed the door upon her and departed. She looked in vain for a seat, and at last appealed to an elderly man near her to know if he would not ‘surrender his seat to a lady.’ He, it seems, was somewhat a humorist, and answered: 'I will surrender it cheerfully, Madam, as I always do, but will beg leave first to ask a civil question. Are you an advocate of the modern theory of women's rights?' Bridling up with intense energy, she replied, "Yes, sir, emphatically; I let you know that it is my glory to be devoted to that noble cause.' 'Very well, Madam,' said he, ‘then the case is altered: You may stand up like the rest of us men, until you can get a seat for yourself.' This was exact poetic justice; and it foreshadows precisely the fate of their unnatural pretensions. Men will treat them as they treat each other; it will be 'every man for himself, and the devil take the hindmost.' … [A]nd the society which will emerge from this experiment will present women in the position which she has always held among savages, that of domestic drudge to the stronger animal…. [S]he will reappear from this ill-starred competition defeated and despised, tolerated only to satiate the passion, to amuse the idleness, to do the drudgery, and to receive the curses and blows of her barbarized masters." - Robert L. Dabney, “Women’s Rights Women” in Discussions, Volume 4, pages 503-504.


"[I]t would not be hard to show, did space permit, that this movement [women's suffrage] on the part of these women is as suicidal as it is mischievous. Its certain result will be the re-enslavement of women, not under the Scriptural bonds of marriage, but under the yoke of literal corporeal force. The woman who will calmly review the condition of her sex in other ages and countries will feel that her wisdom is to 'let well enough alone…'. Under all other civilizations and all other religions than ours, woman has experienced this fate to the full; her condition has been that of a slave to the male--sometimes a petted slave, but yet a slave. In Christian and European society alone has she ever attained the place of man’s social equal and received the homage and honor due from magnanimity to her sex and her feebleness. And her enviable lot among us has resulted from two causes: the Christian religion and the legislation founded upon it by feudal chivalry. How insane then is it for her to spurn these two bulwarks of defense…? She is thus spurning the only protectors her sex has ever found, and provoking a contest in which she must inevitably be overwhelmed." - Robert L. Dabney, "Women’s Rights Women" in Discussions, Volume 4, pages 502-503.





"A woman must be subservient to man. She is not a chattel; she is a helper of man and husband. But a woman must speak to man. She must not assert herself unrightly in the houses of God. Jesus the Lord, your Lord, my sisters and brothers, has made the rule. You cannot change it to suit yourselves. You have been blinded by satan. The liberation in your hearts has been placed there by satan. You gain nothing but your own destruction."

- The Bayside Prophecies

St. Theresa, October 2, 1975





SOURCE:

The electronic form of this document is copyrighted.

Quotations are permissible as long as this web site is acknowledged with a hyperlink to: http://www.tldm.org

Copyright © These Last Days Ministries, Inc. 1996 - 2025 All rights reserved.






German Synodal Way Hoping for Rome to Confirm their Lay Preachers at Mass...



Vatican III

"Watch, My child, what is to be. They will call another Council. Oh, but satan now has his plans. O woe, woe to evil man-what is to come upon them!"

- The Bayside Prophecies

Our Lady of the Roses, February 1, 1974


Worse to Come

"And if you think you have seen carnage now already in the Church, the worst is yet to come, unless you follow the rules given by My Mother many years ago, of prayer, atonement, and sacrifice. By your example you may be able to save others. For soon there will come upon you the great Chastisement. It comes in two parts, My child and My children: the Third World War, and also the Ball of Redemption. These can no longer be delayed. For the good seem to go about their way, perhaps pridefully. We do not seek to accuse or place a stigma on any, but some may pridefully sit back and let others go forth and make these sacrifices and prayers and penance. Because they have become smug, or because they have not the grace to understand that once you receive this grace much is expected of you. You must even work harder to save your brothers and sisters."

- The Bayside Prophecies

Jesus, June 18, 1986


The above Messages from Our Lady were given to Veronica Lueken at Bayside, New York.






German Synodal Way Hoping for Rome to Confirm their Lay Preachers at Mass...


PillarCatholic.com reported on February 27, 2026:


By T.S. Flanders


The German bishops will formally ask the Vatican to permit lay preaching at Masses, new conference chairman Bishop Heiner Wilmer announced Thursday.


According to Church law, homilies at Mass are “reserved to a priest or deacon,” but lay people can receive permission to preach in a church or oratory, “if necessity requires it in certain circumstances or it seems advantageous in particular cases.”


In a report issued at the end of the bishops’ Feb. 23-26 plenary meeting in Würzburg, Wilmer said the request to Rome to permit lay homilies originated in a resolution approved by participants in Germany’s controversial “synodal way” on March 10, 2023.


The document called on Germany’s bishops to “draw up a particular norm and obtain permission for this from the Holy See, according to which the homily can also be taken over in Eucharistic celebrations on Sundays and feast days by theologically and spiritually qualified faithful commissioned by the bishop.”


The resolution noted that it was already a “long-standing practice” in German dioceses for “persons who have qualified themselves through studies in theology and have been sent by the bishop into the ministry of proclaiming the Gospel” to preach at Masses.


It suggested the practice could be expanded to include religious education teachers, “trained people for leading liturgies of the word,” and “spiritual leaders of associations.”


Wilmer, who was elected bishops’ conference chairman Feb. 24, said the bishops had discussed the synodal way resolution on lay preaching at Masses in detail and adopted a regulation that would govern the practice.


“We now want to ask for approval for this regulation in Rome. We have agreed that I will take this with me on my next visit to Rome and explain and promote it once again in discussions there,” he said.


The German bishops’ request seems likely to be rejected not only because it is inconsistent with canon law, but also because the Vatican responded negatively to the synodal way resolution shortly after it was passed.


German Catholic media reported at the end of March 2023 that Cardinal Arthur Roche, the prefect for the Vatican’s Dicastery for Divine Worship, had written to the then-bishops’ conference chairman Bishop Georg Bätzing, rejecting arguments in favor of lay preaching at Masses.


Roche suggested that “misunderstandings about the figure and identity of the priest” could “arise in the consciousness of the Christian community” if lay people preached in place of clergy.


“Word and sacrament are inseparable realities, and since they are not merely formal expressions of the exercise of sacra potestas [sacred power], they are neither separable nor can they be separable,” he said.


The cardinal also highlighted Pope Francis’ opening in 2021 of the ministries of lector and acolyte to women.


“This openness offers lay people the opportunity to engage in meaningful liturgical ministry in the exercise of the ministry of lector and acolyte,” he wrote, expressing interest in “how this possibility was received in the dioceses in Germany.”


Five years later, there is little evidence that German dioceses have seized the opportunities for instituted ministries of lector and acolyte offered by Pope Francis.


Widespread lay preaching at Masses does not appear to take place in any other country than Germany, even in neighboring German-speaking nations.


A draft proposal circulated at Australia’s plenary council in 2022 called for the local Church to petition the Vatican to approve lay homilies. But ultimately, the assembly rejected a motion seeking to amend canon law to permit lay homilies.


In Germany, the practice dates back decades. The German bishops’ conference approved a document in 1988 that set out norms for commissioning qualified lay men and women to preach in specific contexts.


It said: “In cases where the diocesan bishop deems it necessary, Catholic lay people (men and women) may be entrusted with the ministry of preaching during the celebration of the Eucharist, in the form of a statio [introductory address] at the beginning of the service, provided that the celebrant is unable to give the homily and no other priest or deacon is available to do so.”


The document was implemented in dioceses such as Rottenburg-Stuttgart. In 1999, the Rottenburg-Stuttgart diocese issued its own document regulating lay preaching at Masses. The diocese was led at the time by Bishop Walter Kasper, who later served as prefect of the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity.


The document said lay people could preach at Mass when priests or deacons could not deliver the homily due to extraordinary circumstances. As examples of exceptional circumstances, it cited “physical and psychological impairments, e.g. age, illness,” “communication problems, e.g. language difficulties, specific target groups,” “overload due to a high number of sermons,” “the need for special thematic expertise,” and the “need for special pedagogical competence, e.g. children’s, youth, family church services.”


Church law says that “a homily must be given at all Masses on Sundays and holy days of obligation which are celebrated with a congregation, and it cannot be omitted except for a grave cause.”


The 1999 text presented lay preaching at Masses as a responsible way to meet the requirements of canon law when a priest or deacon was unable to preach.


At their spring plenary meeting, the German bishops also approved the statutes of a new permanent body of bishops and lay people known as the synodal conference.


The Catholic website communio.de reported Feb. 27 that the statutes “only very narrowly” secured the approval of the necessary two-thirds majority of the 56 bishops present at the meeting. The bishops’ conference has not confirmed this account of the vote.


Bishop Wilmer said at a Feb. 26 press conference that he would apply for recognitio (approval) for the statutes in Rome.


He argued that the synodal conference “represents the development of a format that takes the concerns of the global synodal process seriously and implements them in our cultural sphere, including the impetus for greater transparency, accountability, and evaluation.”


He added: “The worldwide synodal events have taught us how valuable it is to listen to one another. Synodality remains a spiritual attitude. Walking together, sharing responsibility, making decisions together — and keeping Christ at the center.”


“Trust grows from this center, and trust creates a future. It will be a matter of proclaiming the Gospel with all our strength, with words if necessary.”





JESUS NEVER CHANGES

"Come out of the darkness, my sisters. You have been misled. Do not follow the fashions of your world. There is no fashion in Heaven. Jesus never changes. There is great punishment ahead for those who follow the world. Do not leave when you are discouraged by those who satan has sent into your convents. Stand forth as an example of purity and godliness. You will not be cast aside by your God, as you will by man, as you stand to defend your God. Pick up your cross and carry it. You will return the habit to the floor."

- The Bayside Prophecies

St. Theresa, November 20, 1972





SOURCE:

The electronic form of this document is copyrighted.

Quotations are permissible as long as this web site is acknowledged with a hyperlink to: http://www.tldm.org

Copyright © These Last Days Ministries, Inc. 1996 - 2025 All rights reserved.