“DO NOT SEND ME AWAY”
"Man will weep, man will gnash his teeth in sorrow. It is through the merciful heart of the Father that I have been allowed to come to earth as a Mediatrix between God and man. Do not cast Me aside; do not send Me away, for if you do, you will lose souls, and you as teacher and representatives of my Son shall enter the kingdom of satan. Woe unto the leaders who use their ranks to destroy the souls. You shall not lead the soul to the slaughter."
- The Bayside Prophecies
Our Lady of the Roses, March 18, 1974
MEDIATRIX OF ALL GRACES
"I am the Queen of Heaven, Mother of earth, and Mediatrix of all graces. I will stand here through the turmoil that lies ahead within the holy House of God.”
- The Bayside Prophecies
Our Lady of the Roses, October 6, 1972
“HER VOICE SHALL NOT BE STILLED”
"My Mother has come to you as a Mediatrix between God and man. Her voice shall not be stilled. Her words of warning and direction shall not be cast aside.
“As a disciple of light, each one of you shall go forward and give the Message from Heaven. If you are rejected, continue on to the next door. Your mission is not to force your will upon mankind, but to bring the Message of your God to your brother and your sister and pray that he shall at least look upon and examine this message for the salvation of his soul and the souls of those he loves."
- The Bayside Prophecies
Jesus, March 18, 1976
The above Messages from Our Lady were given to Veronica Lueken at Bayside, New York.
Faithful Worldwide Petition Pope Leo XIV to Re-examine “Mater Populi Fidelis”...
DianeMontagna.substack.com reported on December 8, 2025:
By Diane Montagna
Today, as Catholics around the world celebrate the Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception, a global “filial appeal” initiative is being launched, respectfully urging Pope Leo XIV to re-examine Mater Populi Fidelis.
Titled, A Filial Appeal to Pope Leo XIV, the initiative comes amid persistent and intensifying concerns over last month’s doctrinal Note on the Marian titles “Co-redemptrix” and “Mediatrix of All Graces,” issued by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Written by respected Italian Mariologist, Father Serafino Lanzetta, and available in six languages (with more forthcoming), the letter conveys the “dismay and consternation felt by a significant portion of the holy People of God” after the publication, on 4 November 2025, of the mariological Note.
The one-page appeal continuess:
“As children of the Church, our consciences are profoundly troubled as we read the statements contained in this Note regarding certain Marian titles that refer to the cooperation of Mary Most Holy in the work of our salvation. How can we not be afflicted to see this new mariological position set itself in clear opposition to the teaching handed down until now—teaching which has always recognized in the Virgin Mary a unique, real, and maternal role in the economy of Redemption?”
A “grassroots” initiative, it allows clergy and laity to download the letter, sign and date it, indicate their country and diocese of origin, and mail it directly to the Holy Father at Apostolic Palace in Vatican City.
Fr. Lanzetta, a lecturer in dogmatic theology and prolific author on Marian themes, said he wrote the appeal to serve the faithful who wish respectfully to address their concerns to the Holy Father in a way that is grounded in a rigorous theological assessment of Mater Populi Fidelis.
He was among the first to voice serious reservations about the new doctrinal Note. One week after DDF Prefect Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández presented Mater Populi Fidelis in Rome, Fr. Lanzetta published an in-depth analysis arguing that the document adopts a minimalist view of the Blessed Virgin Mary and represents “a significant downgrade”—not only from the teaching of the saints, doctors, and ordinary magisterium of the popes, but also from the Second Vatican Council’s treatment of Mary’s role in the work of salvation.
Fr. Lanzetta was not alone in his criticism. In an interview with Swiss media, one of Church’s leading authorities on Mariology, Fr. Salvatore Perrella, OSM—a former Professor of Dogmatics and Mariology at the Pontifical Theological Faculty Marianum, who was esteemed by Pope Benedict XVI—offered a searing critique of MPF, saying it reveals the theological and methodological incompetence of those who produced it.
And today, Mater Populi Fidelis faced another significant blow as one of the Church’s foremost associations of Mariologists issued a theological response to the Note, concluding that despite certain positive elements, “there remain significant theological points that require substantial clarification and modification.”
Published on Dec 8 by the International Marian Association Theological Commission (IMATC), the 23-page document evaluates, in light of the papal magisterium and the Church’s great Mariologists, MPF’s stance on the Marian titles “Co-redemptrix” and “Mediatrix of All Graces,” its treatment of Mary’s instrumental and secondary causality of grace, the nature of her merit, and pastoral implications of diminishing the Blessed Virgin’s unique and active role in the work of Redemption.
The IMATC response argues that, by presenting a Redemption based on “Jesus alone” bereft of any human redemptive value on the part of Mary,” the DDF’s doctrinal Note “seems to resemble more a Protestant theology of Redemption than that of the Catholic Church.”
Calling for a “re-evaluation” of Mater Populi Fidelis, its signatories—who include cardinals, bishops, priests and lay theologians such as renowned biblical scholar Dr. Scott Hahn and noted Mariologist Dr. Mark Miravalle—offer an objective yet ultimately scathing analysis of MPF.
Their critique appears to reinforce Fr. Salvatore Perrella’s contention that the Note “should have been prepared by persons competent in the field.”
Amid these sustained theological critiques of Mater Populi Fidelis, the new “filial appeal” initiative offers clergy and laity a simple yet concrete and effective means to ask Pope Leo XIV to “hear their sorrow and intervene in whatever manner he deems most fitting, so that the honor, truth, and special veneration owed to the Most Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God and Our Mother, may be restored.”
Leading Mariologists Publish Scathing Critique of Vatican Note on Mary’s Titles...
[TLDM Editor's note: Everyone must read IMATC's document mentioned below. Not only does it point out the errors in Mater Populi Fidelis, but it also collects what the pope and saints said about Our Lady as Co-redemptrix. A beautiful gift to Our Lady on a very important feast day. You can find it here.]
NCRegister.com reported on December 7, 2025:
By Edward Pentin
One of the Catholic Church’s foremost associations of Mariologists has issued a strongly critical response to Mater Populi Fidelis, a recently published Vatican doctrinal note that has been criticized for its diminution of some long-established devotional Marian titles.
In a 23-page document published Dec. 8, the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, the International Marian Association Theological Commission (IMATC) points to various elements of Mater Populi Fidelis (The Mother Of the Faithful People of God) which it calls erroneous, “unfortunate,” and says are in need of “substantial clarification and modification.”
They describe a significant element of the document as resembling Protestant rather than Catholic theology and urge, “in a spirit of true synodal dialogue,” for Mater Populi Fidelis to be re-evaluated.
Published on Nov. 4 by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Mater Populi Fidelis teaches that Mary’s unique cooperation in salvation must always be understood as entirely dependent on, and subordinate to, Christ’s one mediation and universal redemptive sacrifice, rejecting any formulations that would blur this asymmetry.
The doctrinal note reaffirms approved Marian titles such as Mother of God and Mother of the Church, but judges the titles “Co‑redemptrix” and certain uses of “Mediatrix of all graces” pastorally and theologically ambiguous, discouraging their use in official teaching or liturgy, while not denying the truths they seek to express.
In Catholic theology, the title “Co‑redemptrix” expresses Mary’s unique and entirely subordinate cooperation in Christ’s one redemptive work, above all through her fiat at the Incarnation and her union with his sacrifice, without adding a second redeemer alongside him. The title “Mediatrix of all graces” signifies that every grace won by Christ the sole Mediator is distributed by God through Mary’s maternal intercession, so that she participates as a secondary, dependent channel in the communication of Christ’s grace to humanity.
The 2010 edition of the New Catholic Encyclopedia states that the title Co-redemptrix first appeared in Catholic literature toward the end of the fourteenth century and that “Catholics no longer question its legitimacy” as the title has been used at various times in the intervening centuries, including by the Holy See in the 20th century. The encyclopedia says the genesis of the title Mediatrix of all graces is “rather obscure” but dates back to 8th century saints and “was applied to Our Lady with ever-increasing frequency until it became generally accepted in the seventeenth century.”
The DDF’s diminution of the titles has drawn considerable criticism from Mariologists concerned that it adopts a minimalist view of the Blessed Virgin Mary and her role in salvation. The concern is that it could lessen popular devotion to her, and risks ending new Marian dogmas related to these titles after decades of Mariological work. Still, others have praised it as a clarifying and ecumenically unifying move, re-centering Marian language clearly on Christ and discouraging titles which they believe can be easily misunderstood.
The International Marian Association comprises theologians, bishops, clergy, religious, and lay leaders who seek to promote full Marian truth and devotion throughout the world.
The association’s theological commission comprises cardinals, bishops, and over 40 internationally respected theologians and Mariologists such as U.S. scholars Scott Hahn, Mark Miravalle, and Michael Sirilla
It begins by praising some of the positive aspects of the DDF document. They like its strong emphasis in affirming Christ as the sole divine Redeemer, important scriptural references to Mary’s cooperation in salvation history, and that it “affirms in general the cooperation of the faithful in the saving work of Christ,” and refers to “the singular and distinct cooperation of Mary.”
But the authors, recalling their canonical right to express their concerns to pastors, soon list a plethora of criticisms, noting from the outset that although an expression of the ordinary Magisterium, the doctrinal note is on a “lower level” than direct pronouncements from the Pope.
Co-redemptrix Title
On the title Co-redemptrix, the theologians push back against the note’s warning that it is “always inappropriate” — or, according to some translations, “always inopportune” — to use the title to define Mary’s cooperation. The DDF note says that the title “risks obscuring Christ’s unique salvific mediation” and can therefore cause confusion.
The IMATC counters that statement stating that if the title Co-redemptrix is always inappropriate or inopportune to use, “then the popes who approved or used the title were acting in an inappropriate and imprudent manner.” They add: “If it is always inappropriate to use the title, then the saints and mystics who used this title were irresponsible and inappropriate.”
The theologians welcome a later clarification from DDF prefect Archbishop Victor Fernandez who told the journalist Diane Montagna on Nov. 25 that the title Co-redemptrix is, “from now on,” “always inappropriate” to use in “official documents of the Magisterium” but it can still be used in discussions, prayer groups and private devotion.
But the IMATC says the document still has a “substantial omission of the redemptive value of Mary’s unique active cooperation in objective redemption, as well as what we see to be an unnecessary prohibition of the legitimate Co-redemptrix title from future official documents of the Holy See and from liturgical texts.” The move, they say, represents “an anti-development of doctrine.”
The theologians dismiss various other claims in the DDF note, including its argument that the Marian titles are best not used as they are “unhelpful” as they require “repeated explanations.” Many theological terms require perennial explanation, counters the commission, and cite as examples the title “Mother of God,” the Holy Trinity, transubstantiation and papal infallibility.
They note how, despite ruling not to use the term Co-redemptrix, the DDF acknowledges the title has been used for centuries, and stress that Co-redemptrix had been preferred instead of Redemptrix precisely to emphasize Mary’s subordination and dependency on Christ, the Redeemer.
The theologians cite how often popes have used the title and state that it is “unfortunate” these examples “are not given greater respect or presence in the actual text.” They also recall previous warnings against the contents of the DDF note, quoting Father Rene Laurentin, regarded as “one of the world’s foremost students” of Mariology, who wrote in 1951 it would be “gravely temerarious to attack the legitimacy” of the title Co-redemptrix, and another respected Mariologist, Jesuit Father J. A. De Aldama, who wrote in 1950 that it is “not permitted to doubt its appropriateness.”
Citing prominent theologians of the past, they dispute the DDF’s claim that the Second Vatican Council refrained from using the title, calling the claim “not entirely accurate,” as Lumen Gentium, especially no. 58, “explicitly affirms the doctrine of Mary as Co-redemptrix without using the term.”
They also stress that previous popes, such as Pius XI, Pius XII and John Paul II, have explained the meaning of the title, and taught that Mary is the “New Eve.” The DDF document, they conclude, “is not merely discouraging the Co-redemptrix title; it is also failing to teach in a positive way Mary’s truly redemptive role with and under Jesus in Redemption as put forth by the Papal Magisterium.”
They further contend that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger’s negative response in 1996 to a dogmatic definition of Mary as Co-redemptrix and Mediatrix of all graces “concerned the maturity” of the proposed dogma, “not a repudiation of the titles,” and he never forbade use of the term.
Mediatrix of All Graces
Concerning Mary’s title as Mediatrix of all graces, the IMATC criticized the DDF note for seeking to reduce Mary’s maternal mediation only to intercession and for omitting the teaching of 12 popes, including Pope Francis, over four centuries, that upholds Mary’s universal mediation, each of which it lists.
The Marian association also notes that the DDF failed to mention three pontifical commissions established by Pius XI that resulted in 2,000 pages of theological support in favor of the papal definition of Mary’s universal mediation of grace. After presenting further arguments in support of the title, the IMATC asks that the “longstanding doctrinal teaching” of Mary as Mediatrix of all graces be affirmed and celebrated.
Mater Populi Fidelis states that Marian mediation should not be understood in terms of producing grace, but while the IMATC agrees that true grace only comes from God, it says the note “fails to affirm the active and causal secondary mediation of Mary in the distribution of graces” — something, it says, that previous popes such as Pius X clearly taught. It states that the DDF note “again does not appear reconcilable with papal doctrine.”
Further criticisms of the DDF note the IMATC makes is that the document misses a “true presentation of Mary’s authentic motherhood” and Mary’s intimate union with Christ in the sanctification of souls — a teaching St. John Paul II espoused in his 1987 encyclical Redemptoris Mater. Furthermore, it says the DDF note minimizes Mary’s merits and, it believes, therefore “undermines all human merit and cooperation in the work of redemption.”
The IMATC expresses concern that by lessening the Magisterial doctrine of Mary as Mediatrix of all graces, the DDF has thrown many Marian practices, such as those connected with the Miraculous Medal, the Rosary, and Scapular, “into unnecessary confusion and doubt.” It asks how religious communities who use the Co-redemptrix title in their name are to proceed, and how the 10 million members strong Legion of Mary will respond given that the organization’s handbook has 10 references to Mary as Mediatrix of all graces.
More importantly, the theologians believe the document will undermine the faithful’s confidence in the papal magisterium, and notes “confusion and frustration” in this area “are already being voiced.”
A week before the publication of the IMATC response, Mariologists launched a filial appeal to Pope Leo XIV, noting the “dismay and consternation” among many of the faithful following the publication of Mater Populi Fidelis, and calling on Leo to restore the “honor, truth, and special veneration owed to the Blessed Virgin Mary.”
Protestant More Than Catholic
In conclusion, the IMATC theologians contend that it is “precisely the teachings” of Mary as Co-redemptrix and Mediatrix that “constitute the perpetual doctrine of the Church" as they have been taught from Scripture to the Patristic model of Mary as the New Eve, up to modern and contemporary popes.
They believe the risks mentioned by the DDF “appear more theoretical than real,” and add that, on the contrary, the titles become “excellent opportunities for authentic Catholic evangelization” along with other key Catholic truths that require appropriate explanations.
Catholic theology affirms that God willed the Virgin Mary to have a role in the work of redemption, the theologians stress, and God wished to associate the contribution of an immaculate human woman and mother to his saving design. “To propose, instead, a Redemption based on ‘Jesus alone’ bereft of any human redemptive value on the part of Mary, seems to resemble more a Protestant theology of Redemption than that of the Catholic Church,” the IMATC says.
They close by stating it is their “sincere hope and prayer” that their response will contribute, “in a spirit of true synodal dialogue, to a re-evaluation of Mater Populi Fidelis” and that such a re-evaluation “will lead to a new expression of the Magisterium concerning these critically important Marian doctrines and titles in greater consistency, development, and harmony with the doctrinal teachings of previous popes.”
“Among such teachings,” it says, “are those that recognize the Blessed Virgin Mary as the Co-redemptrix and Mediatrix of all graces.”
"The judgment of your God is not akin to the judgment of man. The Eternal Father will only judge by the heart. Your rank, your accumulation of worldly goods does not set you up before another. Many have sold their souls within the holy House of God. Better that you strip yourself and remove all worldly interests now while you have the time to make amends to your God, for many mitres will fall into hell."
- The Bayside Prophecies
St. Thomas Aquinas, August 21, 1972
GRACES IN ABUNDANCE
"I am the Queen of Heaven, Mother of earth, Mediatrix of all graces. I come to you with graces in abundance, graces for the asking. I will dispense to all those who join Me in rescuing their brothers, many graces—manifestations by means of conversion and cure. I place upon these consecrated, sacred grounds the graces to rescue souls in these dark days."
- The Bayside Prophecies
Our Lady of the Roses, November 20, 1972
SOURCE:
The electronic form of this document is copyrighted.
Quotations are permissible as long as this web site is acknowledged with a hyperlink to: http://www.tldm.org
Copyright © These Last Days Ministries, Inc. 1996 - 2025 All rights reserved.
